Skip to content

Add integration tests for migration and transformation scenarios#33

Merged
Splatcrafter merged 12 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/e2e-and-it-tests
Jan 12, 2026
Merged

Add integration tests for migration and transformation scenarios#33
Splatcrafter merged 12 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/e2e-and-it-tests

Conversation

@Splatcrafter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter commented Jan 12, 2026

This pull request introduces new integration tests to ensure the following scenarios are working as expected:

  • Cross-format migrations.
  • Error recovery during migration processes.
  • Field addition in transformation workflows.

These tests increase confidence in the system's reliability under common and edge cases.

@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2026 18:26
@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter self-assigned this Jan 12, 2026
@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 12, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2026 •
edited
Loading

⚠️ Deprecation Warning: The deny-licenses option is deprecated for possible removal in the next major release. For more information, see issue 997.

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 1 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

aether-datafixers-functional-tests/pom.xml

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-pluginNullUnknown License
Denied Licenses: GPL-3.0-only, GPL-3.0-or-later, AGPL-3.0-only, AGPL-3.0-or-later

OpenSSF Scorecard

Scorecard details
PackageVersionScoreDetails
maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 🟢 6
Details
CheckScoreReason
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1022 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1No tokens found
Dangerous-Workflow⚠️ -1no workflows found
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ -1no dependencies found
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Code-Review🟢 3Found 9/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License⚠️ 0license file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-toml UnknownUnknown
maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml UnknownUnknown
maven/com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml 🟢 7.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 0Found 2/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
maven/com.google.code.gson:gson 🟢 9.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Maintained🟢 1023 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 7dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
CI-Tests🟢 1030 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Contributors🟢 10project has 11 contributing companies or organizations
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-api UnknownUnknown
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-cli UnknownUnknown
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-codec UnknownUnknown
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-core UnknownUnknown
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-schema-tools UnknownUnknown
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-spring-boot-starter UnknownUnknown
maven/de.splatgames.aether.datafixers:aether-datafixers-testkit UnknownUnknown
maven/org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin UnknownUnknown
maven/org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin 🟢 4.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1020 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review🟢 4Found 6/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
License🟢 10license file detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 026 existing vulnerabilities detected
maven/org.assertj:assertj-core UnknownUnknown
maven/org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter 🟢 8.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Code-Review⚠️ 0Found 2/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 10all dependencies are pinned
License🟢 10license file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
CII-Best-Practices🟢 5badge detected: Passing
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
CI-Tests🟢 1012 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Contributors🟢 10project has 61 contributing companies or organizations
maven/org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test 3.4.1 🟢 5.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 0Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Branch-Protection🟢 3branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
SAST⚠️ 0no SAST tool detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 5binaries present in source code
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 4dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 011 existing vulnerabilities detected
maven/org.yaml:snakeyaml UnknownUnknown
maven/org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin 3.1.2 UnknownUnknown

Scanned Files

  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • aether-datafixers-functional-tests/pom.xml
  • pom.xml

@Splatcrafter
Add integration test workflow and Maven failsafe configuration
c1b92eb 
- Introduced `integration-tests` workflow for E2E and integration testing on Java 17 and 21.
- Configured Maven Failsafe Plugin with `it` profile to enable integration tests.
- Set up `skipITs` property to skip ITs by default, with an option to enable them via `it` profile.
@Splatcrafter
Escape workflow name with quotes for consistent formatting in ci.yml.
ce8622d
@Splatcrafter
Remove redundant condition from integration-tests workflow trigger.
f40b1ed
@Splatcrafter
Restrict integration-tests workflow to trigger only on pull request…
62ba61b 
… events.
@Splatcrafter
Reorder integration-tests workflow steps for clarity.
cc805b4
@Splatcrafter
Split CI workflow into separate push and pull_request workflows
84b5139 
- Extracted `pull_request` logic to a new `ci-pr.yml` file for better separation of concerns.
- Updated `ci.yml` to handle only `push` events.
- Preserved integration tests and reporting logic, now scoped specifically to pull request events.
@Splatcrafter
Add condition to run build job only on push events
183ef26
@Splatcrafter
Simplify CI workflows by consolidating and cleaning up configurations
19196b6 
- Removed redundant jobs and permissions from `ci-push.yml` and `ci-pr.yml`.
- Standardized artifact names for unit tests and integration test reports.
- Enhanced modularity with streamlined code quality and dependency check steps.
@Splatcrafter
Enhance CI workflows with modular test reporting
2b1c33f 
- Standardized artifact naming for both unit and integration test XMLs.
- Introduced dedicated jobs for publishing test reports (`unit-report`, `reports`) with consolidated XML data.
- Added report paths and check configurations to improve workflow clarity and feedback.
@Splatcrafter
Remove merge-multiple flag from artifact download steps in ci-pr.yml
7688f0d
@Splatcrafter
Restrict test XML uploads and downloads to Java 21 in ci-pr.yml to …
84061d0 
…prevent report double-counting.
@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter merged commit f9c184c into develop Jan 12, 2026
15 checks passed
@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Jan 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@Splatcrafter Splatcrafter

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v0.5.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Splatcrafter